Mazda Depreciation

Mazda falls right in the middle of the pact with respect to retaining its value, with the Mazda MX-5 Miata and Mazda 6 both posting above average scores at the 5-year mark. The Mazda 3, however, doesn't fare quite as well, falling to the back of the pack in overall depreciation.

The 2018 is our top pick for the best model year value for the Mazda vehicles. With the 2018, you would only pay, on average, 74% of the price as new, with 83% of the vehicle's useful life remaining. The 2015 and 2016 model years are also attractive years for the Mazda models, and provide a relatively good value. Our rankings consider multiple factors, including original new prices, current prices, maintenance costs and remaining years of overall predictabe expenses. Our top ranked model year represents the most car for the money with a Mazda model.

Mazda Depreciation

Year Depreciation Residual Value Percent Left Value Rating
2020 0.00% 100.00% 100.00%
2019 18.49% 81.51% 91.67%
2018 26.12% 73.88% 83.33% Best
2017 32.75% 67.25% 75.00% Good
2016 41.10% 58.90% 66.67% Better
2015 50.15% 49.85% 58.33% Better
2014 55.44% 44.56% 50.00% Good
2013 62.44% 37.56% 41.67%
2012 66.20% 33.80% 33.33%
2011 69.21% 30.79% 25.00%
2010 71.82% 28.18% 16.67%
2009 74.13% 25.87% 8.33%
2008 78.50% 21.50% 0.00%
Year Depreciation Residual Value Value Rating
2020 0.00% 100.00%
2019 18.49% 81.51%
2018 26.12% 73.88% Best
2017 32.75% 67.25% Good
2016 41.10% 58.90% Better
2015 50.15% 49.85% Better
2014 55.44% 44.56% Good
2013 62.44% 37.56%
2012 66.20% 33.80%
2011 69.21% 30.79%
2010 71.82% 28.18%
2009 74.13% 25.87%
2008 78.50% 21.50%

About Our Data and "Useful Lifespan"

We aggregate and analyze millions of automotive data points from a variety of sources, including some of the industry's leading data providers. The historical depreciation tables, charts, values and overall rankings are conducted on a semi-annual basis, with our most recent update published in September 2020.

While the "Useful Lifespan" of a vehicle will vary greatly from one model to the next, and even one owner to the next, we have determined that twelve years is the most appropriate timeframe which will yield us good, usable data - and that any data beyond that timeframe becomes more dispersed, and ultimately less reliable. Moreover, maintenance costs beyond that timeframe become significantly more varied, as a vehicle owner's care of a particular vehicle will greatly impact its value, and ongoing maintenance costs. We are very much hopeful, however, that your car or truck will last well beyond twelve years, and that it gets you to where you want to go.

If you would like to know more about our data and process, check out our FAQ here.